<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Philosophy of Rational Happiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/</link>
	<description>The personal website of Shaun Connell.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunconnell.com/?p=120#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s impossible to be happy in hell, so I agree that rationally one should follow Christ. This is why God appeals to our fear of hell -- not much profit in hell. ;-)

As to happiness being a side benefit, I think there&#039;s simply a misunderstanding by what I mean by happiness. Philosophy is a messy discussion, and often uses words in a different manner than typically meant. In this context, happiness means the achievement of what one wants. So we pursue God because we /want/ to, meaning God is part of our code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s impossible to be happy in hell, so I agree that rationally one should follow Christ. This is why God appeals to our fear of hell &#8212; not much profit in hell. <img src='http://www.shaunconnell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As to happiness being a side benefit, I think there&#8217;s simply a misunderstanding by what I mean by happiness. Philosophy is a messy discussion, and often uses words in a different manner than typically meant. In this context, happiness means the achievement of what one wants. So we pursue God because we /want/ to, meaning God is part of our code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunconnell.com/?p=120#comment-437</guid>
		<description>&quot;Man should find his purpose in life, and act accordingly. How to determine one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Man should find his purpose in life, and act accordingly. How to determine one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunconnell.com/?p=120#comment-423</guid>
		<description>David,
Exactly. As I read the Atlas Shrugged, I was a bit confused as to how it was contrary, at least ideologically, to scriptural principles. I was told that it was -- but an objective look at what is really taught in scriptures shows that there isn&#039;t a contradiction. Self-love is a prerequisite to the love of others.

David,
Some values are objective and some are subjective. 

The foundational value is, of course, the maximization of one&#039;s potential. The only way for this to be an absolute value is if there is an absolute standard for potential. This standard is, of course, existential -- meaning that men technically &quot;choose&quot;* the values.

If there is a value (and consequently a morality) that is not relative to whim, it must obviously be because man has an inherent standard built into his mind.

That said, to make sure there is no confusion, I believe that man is inherently prone to /not/ enjoy Hell. So threat of Hellfire is a great starting point to the formulation of values. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
Exactly. As I read the Atlas Shrugged, I was a bit confused as to how it was contrary, at least ideologically, to scriptural principles. I was told that it was &#8212; but an objective look at what is really taught in scriptures shows that there isn&#8217;t a contradiction. Self-love is a prerequisite to the love of others.</p>
<p>David,<br />
Some values are objective and some are subjective. </p>
<p>The foundational value is, of course, the maximization of one&#8217;s potential. The only way for this to be an absolute value is if there is an absolute standard for potential. This standard is, of course, existential &#8212; meaning that men technically &#8220;choose&#8221;* the values.</p>
<p>If there is a value (and consequently a morality) that is not relative to whim, it must obviously be because man has an inherent standard built into his mind.</p>
<p>That said, to make sure there is no confusion, I believe that man is inherently prone to /not/ enjoy Hell. So threat of Hellfire is a great starting point to the formulation of values. <img src='http://www.shaunconnell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Personius</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>David Personius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunconnell.com/?p=120#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Happiness is the emotional response to the achievement of one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happiness is the emotional response to the achievement of one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunconnell.com/the-philosophy-of-rational-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunconnell.com/?p=120#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Hey Shaun great to see you at the open. 

Great post, I really like your point that to create a consistent value system, even a Christian one, you must be selfish in some way. I&#039;ve always had such a hard time explaining that idea of Rand to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Shaun great to see you at the open. </p>
<p>Great post, I really like your point that to create a consistent value system, even a Christian one, you must be selfish in some way. I&#8217;ve always had such a hard time explaining that idea of Rand to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

